1. Welcome to San Diego Chargers NFL Football Podcast and Forum!
    Bolt Talk is one of the largest online communities for the San Diego Chargers.
    We host a regular Chargers podcast during the season.

    You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Create an Account or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!

Albert wants $8-9 million per season.... Dolphins balk

Discussion in 'Chargers Fan Forum' started by Blue Bolt, Apr 21, 2013.

  1. Blue Bolt
    Online

    Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    17,471
    Ratings Received:
    +2,757 / 47 / -26
    Branden Albert trade won’t happen unless he lowers his price
    Posted by Michael David Smith on April 21, 2013, 6:46 PM EDT
    The much-discussed potential trade of Branden Albert from the Chiefs to the Dolphins doesn’t appear likely at the price Albert is currently seeking.
    Although the Chiefs and Dolphins can probably agree on compensation — the Dolphins sending a second-round pick to Kansas City — the hangup is that Albert wants the kind of money that the Dolphins aren’t willing to spend. Specifically, according to Jason Cole of Yahoo! Sports, Albert wants between $8 million and $9 million a year on a long-term deal.
    In other words, Albert is looking for the same kind of contract that left tackle Jake Long got from the Rams — the very contract the Dolphins wouldn’t give Long, which is why he left Miami for St. Louis.
    If the Dolphins weren’t willing to pay Long that kind of money, it’s hard to see why they’d be willing to give up a second-round draft pick for the privilege of paying Albert that kind of money. So the Dolphins may need to look elsewhere for a left tackle. And Albert may have to settle for playing this season for the Chiefs, making $9.8 million, and hitting free agency next year.
  2. NYCharger
    Offline

    NYCharger BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2013
    Messages:
    162
    Ratings Received:
    +42 / 2 / -0
    This is what I've been saying since Albert went on the market. No reason to pay Albert Jake Long money AND give up a second rounder when you could have had Jake Long for just money unless you think Albert is a huge upgrade over Long.
  3. Blue Bolt
    Online

    Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    17,471
    Ratings Received:
    +2,757 / 47 / -26
    And it means the Chiefs will be stuck with Albert, and they'll draft a LT with their 1st rounder anyway.
  4. powayslugger
    Offline

    powayslugger 2014--- Bring on the Lombardi!

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    894
    Ratings Received:
    +138 / 3 / -0
    i don't think Albert is $9 million special.
  5. Pointyearedog
    Offline

    Pointyearedog BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    3,013
    Location:
    Golden Hill
    Ratings Received:
    +809 / 5 / -0
    Are we talking Marv or Fat Albert?
  6. DenverBolt67
    Offline

    DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,477
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +627 / 5 / -3
    Which means Joekel/Fisher will be playing RT for a year, and the Chiefs will end up letting Albert walk next year with no compensation, because Albert has refused to play RT or guard

Share This Page