I'm soooo sorry... This sounds corny but there is still time to turn that around... Lots of cfb and nfl left to play.
Man, New Orleans is at Dallas this week. :icon_sad: It might be tough to root against Romo in this one. :no:
Early NFL leans... BUF M/L +183... I think last week the Bills showed that they are no chumps. The Jets aren't rolling over either, but I think this is a classic "flip of the coin" kinda game. At +183 I think it's totally worth a shot. TEN +1... The Titans have pulled off some wild victories this season and Houston still sucks. I also like OVER 42 for this game 'cause neither of these teams has a defense. BAL +3... KC is nasty @ home, but if the Ravens can shut LJ down this should be a very close game. Gimmie the points!
San Diego M/L looks very tempting. Yes, I know betting San Diego -9 gives +118, but I'd rather go for the 99% sure thing of San Diego M/L -315. Bet $945 and get $300 in winnings. That's still a 31.7% return on your bet. Think if it in normal financial stock/investment terms. When wouldn't you take a 31.7% return on your 'investment' in only 4 hours? Actually, you may want to double dip on that. Bet $100 on San Diego -9 at +118. Bet $945 on San Diego M/L at -315. If San Diego wins by 10 points, you get a total of $418 in winnings by betting $1045. That's a 40% return. If San Diego wins by exactly 9 points, you get $300 total winnings. If San Diego wins by 1 to 8 points, you get a net $200 in winnings. Only if San Diego loses do you actually lose money.
Slug... your logic is solid, but I've never been able to accept "betting a lot to win a little." In short if the payout is less than my investment (minus juice) I'm not really intereted in the action. And I don't mean to be negative, but this game is not a gimmie. :no:
I thought the same thing.... OK, guys, we'll need to be here for leis when she dumps him... :hilarious: j/k
