Who had more fantasy pts in the first 3 weeks? Cause obviously the Rivers @home stuff doesn't matter.
Holy hell, our OL keeps playing like this and Rivers won't last much longer. Oh wait, we won, so all is okay in the world wait...dammit....got my homer hat back on here. You see how pounded the rawk on the ground today VL? Fargin awesome. I swear we can run our way to the VL the way Mathews is going. Thomas and Og rawk and Butler is bound for the Pro Bowl. All IS indeed rolling. Who had more fantasy pts in the first 3 weeks? Cause obviously the Rivers @home stuff doesn't matter. Dammitt...sorry. Play Rivers.
Holy hell, our OL keeps playing like this and Rivers won't last much longer. Oh wait, we won, so all is okay in the world wait...dammit....got my homer hat back on here. You see how pounded the rawk on the ground today VL? Fargin awesome. I swear we can run to the VL the way Mathews is going. EDIT:your initals are the same as the Super Bowl trophy and you just hung that moniker on this year--coincidence? I think not? Your mojo, Thomas and Og rawk and Butler is bound for the Pro Bowl. All IS indeed rolling.
So much gloom and doom... Never can please everyone. I guess the damn Packers should've shut it down last year. Finish strong is all I have to say.
Even a good one against a top 5 opponent. 1st win at home for them... hope more to come. Seriously tho... when the schedule came out, weren't the Bolts expected to be 2-1? I'm good with it.
Complicated is when you have to pass hundreds of teams to win the ultimate championship. Simple is when you have to be better than three others to get a shot at winning four games in a row.
Ya... I've got a question about that.... Bundesliga-wise. http://www.worldfootball.net/wettbewerb/bayernliga/ Look at the Bayernliga (5.Liga), and go to the table in the bottom right. The top 9 get promoted? Do I read that correctly?
Are you sure you want to share the same initials as VL? Also, when's the last time you saw the Bolts finish strong? EDIT: Crap, I'm sorry, I keep losing it. I'm back on track now. Here we go: 1. We're 2-1 with Rivers playing good instead of great, just wait until he picks it up. 2. Did you see the way we controlled the DL with a bunch of backups? Legendary. 3. Did you see me nail that goose from 100 yds today...wait..wrong forum 4. We have a backup kicker people a BACKUP kicker, and we're still kicking ***. 5. The Steelers barely beat the Colts tonight and the refs helped them out. The refs were against us. Therefore we're better than the Steelers. 6. Hacker-Pschorr is pisswater...wait...sorry...wrong forum again 7. Notice how the Lions barely beat the Vikings? And we pwned the Vikings? And the Lions are good this year? #hatersgonnahate 8. Wait until Stephen Cooper's arm gets better. 9. Travis Laboy kicks ***. Once he and Diggs get the terminology down, we'll see the sacks go exponential. 10. Tolbert got the message and held on to the ball today. All systems go.
AJ, in case you haven't noticed, no other GM subscribes to that strategy. They build teams to win it all. Some suck at it. Some succeed. But the 'everyone has the same odds once you make the playoffs' thing because you won the AFCW is like saying 'just cause FCBolt can start a chess game on SMM, he has a 50/50 chance of beating Sandy (independent of margarita intake)"
Sandy/Tyce - are you really impressed with the way the this team has been playing? We've eeked out two wins against the Vikes and Squaws. Hell, we may even get a few more unspectacular wins against the Phins and Donkeys. Then a bye. After that, the hammer drops. If nothing changes, it will not be pretty. How'd that "we start slow, however, were better towards the end of the season" work out for us last year? And the Turds are looking pretty damn solid, as much as it pains me to say it. Had we played them today, we would have gotten our arses kicked. Chew on that.
Yeah, you can say "a win is a win", but struggling in the "easy portion" of our schedule doesn't exactly build optimism for this team's chances late in the year. They have a lot of fixin' to do, and I'm sad to say, it starts with our starting QB. Never thought I'd have to say that. If these injuries linger, then we may be heading for a tough stretch, despite the dubious quality of our next two opponents.
No doubt. The Raiders are going to run at our RDE until he drops...and apparently that's not too hard a thing to do. Further, who gives a sheet about starting slow? We've seen this before. A team that is not playoff tough and it's apparent already. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me..eh whatever...if people want to fly the flag, they'll do it until they die, despite all logic to the contrary (just ask Sarah Palin supporters )
The fargin donkeys played okay today. I have standing bets with fellow Coloradoans/Montanans etc etc that have earned me a sheetload of money over the past few years. This year I'm ******* worried. And I'm sitting in the stands with the bastages too. I'm hoping the donks start Tebow
Welcome to the darkside Corpsie - about damn time you showed up. Sit in one of our nice lounge chairs, and snap your fingers for a beverage of your choice - Gooey will be right at your service. Anything you need, just ask.
To be honest, Taco... I joined the darkside after the Bolts laid an egg against Cinci last season... that was a dagger to my little corpse heart. No more big expectations from me... I'm in the NN camp... or at best RR.
Rivers needs to get out of his head. Two interceptions in each of three games is a pattern, and not a positive one. The O-line isn't helping, however, that doesn't excuse poor choices (even though a few good defensive plays were made).
Rivers had 13 INTs last year, and that was hardly his best year as far as turnovers go. In 2009, he only had 9 INTs. This year, he already has 6...... that's troubling, considering he's only played 3 games.
