Official Game Day Thread: Raiders vs Chargers - 12/30

Discussion in 'Chargers Fan Forum' started by Blue Bolt, Dec 30, 2012.

  1. SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,081
    Ratings Received:
    +1,812 / 3 / -3
    Funny if draft position is so highly important, then why are the Patriots, the Steelers, the Ravens, the Bears, and the Packers always drafting towards the end of the draft order and yet they always seem to find the good players?
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Carlsbad_Bolt_Fan Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Message Count:
    6,072
    Ratings Received:
    +1,074 / 10 / -4
    Eh, let the draftniks gripe. We've beaten the turds 3 straight times.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. FCBolt Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Message Count:
    5,755
    Ratings Received:
    +340 / 7 / -2
    Cause they don't have AJ Smith pulling the trigger for them. And hopefully neither will we:abq1:
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. HEXEDBOLT Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,521
    Ratings Received:
    +1,209 / 35 / -3
    Draft position is over rated to an extent and I'll take a win any time over a loss for a pick.
  5. Lance19 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,435
    Location:
    Wherever these Valkyries drop me...
    Ratings Received:
    +641 / 14 / -1
    The only certain thing about having frequent good draft position, is that your team sucks.
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Message Count:
    14,510
    Ratings Received:
    +1,869 / 32 / -19
    I'll glad Al Davis is around to read that. ;)

    They reamed the Raiders' drafts on the broadcast......... The pick after Robert Gallery was Larry Fitzgerald. Pick after JaMarcus Russell was Calvin Johnson. Just two examples of Al's genius.
  7. SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,081
    Ratings Received:
    +1,812 / 3 / -3
    it might just be those same people that believe we can build the Oline through free agency!
  8. ETicket Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Message Count:
    830
    Ratings Received:
    +199 / 1 / -0
    Obviously, a high draft position is an advantage. That's why teams who trade up give away picks to do so. However, quality NFL organizations often (not always) manage to do well in the draft in spite of not having that advantage.
  9. DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,388
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +587 / 5 / -3
    Interesting. It is actually better than I expected going into the day. Now let's hope our next GM doesn't screw up this gift of a draft spot
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,213
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    I'd hardly call it a gift, we're not exactly in prime position to replace Jared Gaither anymore, we're counting on teams like Arizona, Philadelphia, Detroit, and Tennessee to decide they have bigger needs than finding their left tackle of the future. And a team like Miami who is about to let its franchise LT walk away, to not trade from 12 to 10 and steal our guy knowing we have no choice

    In fact its a pretty painful position to be in, as its unlikely the only top 10 worthy CB Dee Milliner will be sitting there still at 11. Our draft is in the hands of the 10 teams before us now, and a couple that sit just behind us.
  11. Holy_Bolt Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,526
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    Ratings Received:
    +220 / 1 / -0
    Hey...The good news is we Beat the Raturds. The better news is the season is over! It is simple...screw draft picks...be happy that this embarrassing season is over and we should be clearing the way to bring in management that is competent...or at least a new management team. Maybe we will have new issues to discuss soon!
  12. SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,081
    Ratings Received:
    +1,812 / 3 / -3
    And if a team only needs one player to fill a need, then do it. However one player is not going to fix our numerous problems!
  13. Ikeman83 Werter Pöbel

    Member Since:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,397
    Location:
    Flensburg, Germany
    Ratings Received:
    +608 / 39 / -7
    Except that a top 5 pick in each round means that you can possibly get 2-3 quality immediate starters in a single draft, as opposed to only being able to reasonably expect 1-2.
  14. DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,388
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +587 / 5 / -3
    We haven't even gotten that lately, at least not 'immediately'
  15. Ikeman83 Werter Pöbel

    Member Since:
    Feb 3, 2012
    Message Count:
    2,397
    Location:
    Flensburg, Germany
    Ratings Received:
    +608 / 39 / -7
    Reyes came on pretty quickly. I think that the Jets might've gotten the better pass-rusher between Coples and Ingram, but it's way too early in their careers to tell. I just hope that Ingram comes on better in his second year, we really need top performances from him.
  16. Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Message Count:
    14,510
    Ratings Received:
    +1,869 / 32 / -19
    Liuget looked like :poop: in his first year, and look hard far he's come along.

    There's still hope for Melvin.......... English?..... not so much. ;)
  17. DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,388
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +587 / 5 / -3
    Reyes has been descent for a rookie, but to me, he hasn't been an impact player. I do think he and Ingram will be good next year, and Liuget has been pretty good, but he was also not an immediate impact player his rookie year.

    We really need to hit on this draft, like in 04, and get a player or 2 to be immediate starters along the O-line
  18. SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,081
    Ratings Received:
    +1,812 / 3 / -3
    as long as we pick up two starters on both sides of the line, then some DBs, That coupled with a few free agents that want to be here after AJ and Norv leave us. I would tend to think we should be in a much better position to beat Denver next year.
  19. Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Message Count:
    14,510
    Ratings Received:
    +1,869 / 32 / -19
    Reyes wasn't a starter this year, until the end, when Martin got hurt. Liuget started all of last season and only recorded 14 tackles and 1 sack....... largely a non-factor. Reyes has 16 tackles, 5.5 sacks and 1 PDef...... a more impressive start to his career. I don't have the snap totals, but Liuget had a lot more opportunities than Reyes in his rookie year.
  20. DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,388
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +587 / 5 / -3
    Thats all fine, Reyes also had a full training camp, Liuget didn't. To me, I want a player to start and do well or play significant time and do well, in order to call them an immediate impact. I don't believe Reyes fit that bill
  21. Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Message Count:
    14,510
    Ratings Received:
    +1,869 / 32 / -19
    Well, then neither does Ingram, but guess who has more sacks? ;)
  22. DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,388
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +587 / 5 / -3
    Thats fine, I wouldn't consider Ingram an immediate impact player either. I do think he and Reyes will be great players, but just not immediate impact players. And going into next year, unless we get a bunch of FA's, we are going to need immediate impact players on the line in order improve next year
  23. Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Message Count:
    14,510
    Ratings Received:
    +1,869 / 32 / -19
    Would Merriman have been immediate impact without a little help? ;)

    It usually takes players at least a year to adjust to the NFL. That doesn't mean they won't make some plays as a rookie, but to expect a bunch of game changers in one draft is unrealistic.
  24. DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,388
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +587 / 5 / -3
    Since he passed 21 drug tests prior to his failure, i don't think it is reasonable to assume he was on roids his rookie year.

    I am not saying it doesn't take time for most players, I am saying we need at least 1 immediate impact player in this years draft.
  25. Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Message Count:
    14,510
    Ratings Received:
    +1,869 / 32 / -19
    Do we know he wasn't using in college?........ no, we don't. But that's neither here, nor there.

    That fact was, Merriman was blessed by coming to a team with a dominant NT that demanded a double team on every play. Jamal Williams was that good. Think how much easier Ingram would've had it with a guy like that in the middle.

Share This Page