We gave up 24 points in the 1st half, are you guys happy with our 1940's 3-4 d even with all the better players we signed? 1magine if this was a real game the Cards would have called timeouts when we had the ball at the end of the 1st half. The Cards would have had plenty of time to score another TD on us that half =(. I hope my fellow fans know every good team in the NFL knows they can run up the middle vs us based on our D formation flaws by now. 3-4 was always a stop the sweep run D and try and sack the QB if u rush your DE every time, which in 1940 the sweep was 90% of offense was built on. Yet we for what-ever reason drop off our DE's all the time as some kind of strat =/. Also I don't know if anyone understands our running problems. Let me try and explain we run on 2nd down and 10 to go basically. So the D is expecting a pass and we need huge yards so of course our running in long distance passing situations will always be sqewed and misleading, as if we have a good running scheme/team. Yet, factually my mathematical system I designed says that only runs on 1st down and 10 to go tells the truth about how effective your running plays are, factually. I am sad that I cannot help this team out with my schemes/plans/formations/knowledge/plays. Does anyone care or see a problem with our schemes besides me? Our only good yard plays on offense is still passes to our RB & 1 deep hook route dead after catch play, are you guys happy with this scheme? Our TD came on what the announcer called the longest 3 yard pass in the history of the NFL =/. Our scheme vs the blitz looks non-existent as the announcer says, "good job Rivers for throwing the ball away", is like saying your ability to see and call or have a built in scheme to succeed vs the blitz is still non existent! Be honest people! (Anyone wonder why I post my strats/schemes every year to try and help out? I buy tickets and hate watching such a talented team get scheme raged)
Preseason (Yes, I'd respond the same way had everything gone great in the game. I wasn't all up in arms with giddiness last week)
your shyte is getting old rapidly. If you dont like the way the team is run, go find another team. matter of fact go become a Raiders fan. They use guns amongst themselves.
You're really Rip the Jacker, aren't you? No that can't be right - his QB of choice went to the Seahags. MTL??
I expect to be able to learn from 99% of the posters on this site, YOU - world chump, are the 1% left over.
Oh I thought it was World Chump.... I will say this his name is the most effective way I have ever seen someone admit they are a selfcentered dellusional... oyea loser. BUT seriously you are doing this on purpose. You would not play anyone over Rivers. RUN TELL THAT!
I seriously expected to see some kind of tactical change with our new D cord. I have seen none. So why would I not panic? I buy tickets to the game only to forsee problems =/. The 3-4 scheme we run is not run the way it was designed. Mainly for those who don't understand, the DE position is supposed to go after the QB on every play unless the RB goes out in a pass route, then he covers him. We do not do this, get it? This is a huge problem, not a small one. We will blitz a lot, which will seem to make our D look good, but it will fail miserably TBH. Also our blitzes are so bad, I can predict 95% the time when we are blitzing. Almost every single time a DB comes up to the LOS we will blitz, even when he tries to fake a blitz then fall back, that means he is still blitzing, it's so bad friends =(. Any wise team will understand this and run vs us basically anywhere. Up the middle or outside knowing we drop off our 2 DE's way too often & they are not taught to keep outside contain. We need a real D or we will not win SB's fellow fans, think about what I'm saying please.
I'll try and make our flawed D scheme as clear as possible. Our DE's drop back into ZONE coverage about 75% of the time. This idea was never EVER supposed to happen in the original 3-4 1940's scheme. This is a HUGE flaw in our D. Much less this defense was designed to stop outside runs. To make things worse we also use our DE position to HOLD the LOS type of strat another failed idea. To compound things even worse try and understand what I'm saying, the DE position is supposed to have the 1940's scheme of what they call outside contain. We do not even attempt to teach this to our DE's thus watch replay of that 17 yd run vs us where gamble (Supposed to have had outside contain DE/olb that side) gets inside and the RB gets the outside for free. Eventually gamble get credit for the tackle 17 failed yards later. In summary: We rush 3 players to the QB losing 2 as originally designed. Supposed to be rushing 5 at the QB like the Patriots do every single play. Is Bill B a genius for knowing how to teach and run the 3-4 as designed when teams like us do not know how to? This is so bad people, please someone say they understand these problems. Someone here must have coached or played on a good team before right?
