Spoles 2.0? even better?

Discussion in 'NFL Draft' started by charger1993, Apr 20, 2010.

  1. charger1993 bad motherfucker

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,194
    Ratings Received:
    +51 / 1 / -0
    While cruising the almighty youtube. i tripped over trindon holliday he's projected a 7th round or free agent at 5 ft 5 165 hes a steal to replace sproles if we trade him. sproles is 5 ft 6 185. so we could get this guy in the 7th

    1)Brandon Grahm(De)
    2)Vladimir Ducasse(Ot)
    2)Ben Tate(Rb)
    3)Terrel Troup(Nt)
    4)Walter McFadden (Cb)
    5)Pat Angerer(ILB)
    5)Shawn Lauvao(OG)
    7)Freddie Barnes(WR)

    wouldnt u like the back field to look like this



  2. Chargerfn909 High and tight kid, high and tight!

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Message Count:
    540
    Ratings Received:
    +34 / 6 / -1
    Check out Michael Smith from Arkansas.. He's Sproles 2.0
  3. charger1993 bad motherfucker

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,194
    Ratings Received:
    +51 / 1 / -0
    i think trindon holliday has better value
  4. Chargerfn909 High and tight kid, high and tight!

    Member Since:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Message Count:
    540
    Ratings Received:
    +34 / 6 / -1
    Not in my eyes. Smith is 5'9'' 180...Holliday is 5'5'' 161... You simply cannot play RB in the NFL at 161lbs. They are both lighting fast, I see Holliday as a punt/kick returner and that ONLY.
  5. charger1993 bad motherfucker

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,194
    Ratings Received:
    +51 / 1 / -0
    yea all sproles is is pr/kr with a 3rd down back, holliday would be ideal on screen passes and wheel routes
  6. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,213
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    I'd like to land this guy next year...

  7. charger1993 bad motherfucker

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,194
    Ratings Received:
    +51 / 1 / -0
    Height-
    Weight-
    Forty Time-
    Projected Round-
  8. DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,402
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +595 / 5 / -3
  9. charger1993 bad motherfucker

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,194
    Ratings Received:
    +51 / 1 / -0
  10. Boltjolt Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,629
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Ratings Received:
    +387 / 0 / -0
    Hell No! Holliday is 159 lbs and will NEVER, and i repeat, NEVER see action in the backfield and wasnt that great a return guy at LSU. He only got up to 166 for the combine because he is a shrimp.....and even that is too small. He played under 160 during his entire career.
  11. charger1993 bad motherfucker

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,194
    Ratings Received:
    +51 / 1 / -0
    could u imagine how well the screen and wheel routes would be with this guy, he wouldnt be that effective of a runner but id love him running out the backfield
  12. Boltjolt Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 18, 2006
    Message Count:
    4,629
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    Ratings Received:
    +387 / 0 / -0
    No!...he wont ever play out of the backfield in the NFL. He just wont. We get many LSU games here in Vegas and ive watched Holliday since he was a freshman and he never really did much. Even his kick returns for TD's were against the likes of North Texas and Tulane.

    Casserly even said today that McCluster will be a slot WR only in the NFL and to forget about him even being a 3rd down RB.....which is also what ive been saying about him as well and if he isnt going to be a in a backfield at all, you can bet your *** that Holliday isnt.
  13. charger1993 bad motherfucker

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    1,194
    Ratings Received:
    +51 / 1 / -0
    true u do have a point

Share This Page