Teams pursuing Whitehurst?

Discussion in 'Chargers Fan Forum' started by matilack, Mar 6, 2010.

  1. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,212
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    We tendered him with a 3rd, and there has been a lot of talk on NFL network about 4 or 5 teams that have shown serious inteterest in the past and the Chargers have turned down trade offers.

    Jason La Canfora on NFL network says he wouldn't be surprised if someone gave up a 3rd round pick to get him, possibly the Bills or 49rs.
  2. Ride The Lightning You stay classy San Diego!

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Message Count:
    10,590
    Location:
    Chula Vista, CA
    Ratings Received:
    +1,471 / 7 / -2
  3. foober BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Aug 17, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,980
    Ratings Received:
    +200 / 0 / -0
    I'll believe it when i see it.
  4. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,212
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    Me too, but I'd love to see it.:tup: Whitehurst is as much of a wasted draft pick as we've ever had, and he hasn't shown a lick of potential in pre-season games.
  5. HollywoodLeo Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Message Count:
    13,024
    Ratings Received:
    +1,255 / 23 / -0
    You must have not been at the Seattle game in the 2006 preseason that I was at where Charlie had some really good plays.

    Granted, that was 4 years ago, but still.

    Any rate, it's kind of hard for him to prove anything when he's sitting behind Rivers and Volek. The fact that he's still drawing interest as a 3rd string says something.

    We could have just as easily wasted that draft pick on some garbage player who would amount to nothing, but instead we had a decent 3rd string.

    Truth be told, if any team is down to their 3rd string QB they're in a world of pain, but nevertheless I wouldn't call it a complete waste of a draft pick if he's a 3rd string QB that shows enough potential to draw interest for a 3rd round pick.
  6. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,212
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    No I kind of phased that one game out after the other 3 pre-seasons where he SUCKED.:lol:

    I'd be happy to take the 3rd rounder for him, and spend a 6th rounder on a guy like John Skelton who reminds me of Joe Flacco.
  7. HollywoodLeo Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Message Count:
    13,024
    Ratings Received:
    +1,255 / 23 / -0
    To be fair, I haven't watched preseason games since then. :lol:
  8. Retired Catholic BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Message Count:
    7,893
    Location:
    Banker's Hill
    Ratings Received:
    +347 / 0 / -0
    The Jaguars.
  9. cranberry BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,989
    Location:
    Gross Gerau, Germany, Frankfurt area
    Ratings Received:
    +191 / 0 / -0
    A third string QB is someone, who can stay calm, knowing he only can play assuming injuries. It's good to have Whitehurst knowing our system so well. A one year or rookie QB wants to have playing time. So if we get a 3rd or 4th round pick for
    Charlie or if he stays with the Chargers. Both will be good.
  10. CoronaDoug Hipsters Suck

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Message Count:
    7,351
    Location:
    D F W
    Ratings Received:
    +753 / 10 / -2
    I would gladly give him up for a 3rd. :tup:
    I din't think that it will happen though.
    • Super Moderator

    LT-Express Cleaning up messes on BT since 2006

    Member Since:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,158
    Location:
    CIncinnati, OH
    Ratings Received:
    +246 / 0 / -0
    I seriously doubt a 3rd round tender would be gotten for Charlie.

    I mean seriously we just traded a former pro-bowl CB in Cromartie for a 3rd round tender. The thought of a guy who has taken a handful of snaps at the pro level after 4 years, doesn't really add up to getting a 3rd rounder for him.

    Not saying some desperate team wouldn't just saying it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY.
  11. powayslugger Optimistic for 2013

    Member Since:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    835
    Ratings Received:
    +118 / 1 / -0
    Charlie carries a mean clipboard. Let's face it if he ever gets into a game it's too soon. If someone is dumb enough to give a a draft pick... take it.
  12. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,212
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    Its a simple fact that QB is a higher value than a CB.:yes:

    If someone thinks he can be the Matt Cassell to Rivers I think a 3rd is more than fair.
    • Super Moderator
    • Article Writer
    • Podcaster

    AnteaterCharger Calibrating Bolttalk, Podcast by Podcast

    Member Since:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Message Count:
    17,254
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Ratings Received:
    +2,021 / 13 / -0
    I'm inclined to agree, not sure there's enough to justify any team acquiring him unless they really just loved what they saw in the very limited playing time he's had. Maybe someone thinks he's a matt cassell but don't forget no one would've traded anything for matt cassell until he was forced to start for a year after brady went down.
  13. HollywoodLeo Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Message Count:
    13,024
    Ratings Received:
    +1,255 / 23 / -0
    I think a better comparison would be Jake Delhomme and Matt Schaub.

    What did they get in trades? (Neither saw much play time but were still coveted by their new teams)
  14. paddyirishman BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Message Count:
    775
    Ratings Received:
    +60 / 0 / -0
    Would be happy to get back a 3rd round pick for him, exactly what we used to get him.
  15. DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Member Since:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,378
    Location:
    Denver, Co
    Ratings Received:
    +583 / 5 / -3
    I would be happy to get anything for him. IMO, a 3rd string QB is nothing more than a practice squad player. If a team gets down to their 3rd string QB, their season is over. Keeping a roster spot for a QB seems like a waste if you can just keep a QB on the practice squad to run the scout offense.
  16. Buck Melanoma Guest

    Member Since:
    Message Count:
    0
    Ratings Received:
    +408 / 17 / -4
    I'd take the 3rd & use the roster spot to keep an extra DL or OL.

    Legedu could be our emergency QB.
    • Super Moderator

    LT-Express Cleaning up messes on BT since 2006

    Member Since:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,158
    Location:
    CIncinnati, OH
    Ratings Received:
    +246 / 0 / -0
    Both of which were 2nd stringers not 3rd......And not sitting there carrying a clipboard sitting behind Billy Volek.....

    A team would be picking up Charlie to get him as a back up not a starter. If you were in the front office would you give up a 3rd round pick for a back up QB?
    • Super Moderator

    LT-Express Cleaning up messes on BT since 2006

    Member Since:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,158
    Location:
    CIncinnati, OH
    Ratings Received:
    +246 / 0 / -0

    Agreed QB is a higher value, but somehow that makes this arguement more intriguing......

    Let's see Matt Cassell was a 2nd STRING QB not a 3rd......Not to mention that he played an entire season on a team with a loaded offense and had a good year. Thus garnering the interest to be a starter.

    Charlie Whitehurst has seen little to no action at all, and some is a 3rd STRING QB sitting behind Billy Volek. Billy Volek probably wouldn't get a 3rd round tender, which means it's likely that Whitehurst wouldn't either.
  17. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,212
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    The problem is Volek turns 34 in April, Whitehurst is 27. We've been developing him behind Rivers for 3 or 4 years now and I think AJ is going to count on him a little more when Volek either retires or we can't renew his contract.

    I don't see AJ settling for anything less than a 3rd.
    • Super Moderator

    LT-Express Cleaning up messes on BT since 2006

    Member Since:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,158
    Location:
    CIncinnati, OH
    Ratings Received:
    +246 / 0 / -0
    My guess is if he does that, Charlie Whitehurst will be a back up QB for the rest of his career.....

    Unless you know...Somehow he finds his way on to the field and all.
  18. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,212
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    :unsure: Don't even joke. :icon_tease:
  19. HollywoodLeo Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Message Count:
    13,024
    Ratings Received:
    +1,255 / 23 / -0
    What difference does it really make, though?

    Both Volek and Whitehurst are carrying clipboards on Sundays.

    I guess you can point out that Volek played a little in garbage time in week 17, but whatever.

    Whitehurst is younger than Volek. I'm not trying to suggest Charlie should command a third rounder (I was a bit surprised to even read that) but I would guess he would be worth more than a 34 yr old career back up in Volek simply because of his age.
  20. matilack #therealagent47

    Member Since:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Message Count:
    11,212
    Ratings Received:
    +1,397 / 16 / -14
    I was surprised too:icon_eek:, but I wouldn't have made the post if I hadn't heard the rumor multiple times. And La Canfora from NFL.com says at least 4 teams have mentioned Whitehurst.
  21. CoronaDoug Hipsters Suck

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Message Count:
    7,351
    Location:
    D F W
    Ratings Received:
    +753 / 10 / -2
    I think that it is time to move him to #2 or trade him (if we can). He has had enough time riding the pine and learning the system. If he is not developing then bring in someone else.
  22. HollywoodLeo Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Message Count:
    13,024
    Ratings Received:
    +1,255 / 23 / -0
    If he's the #2 he's still riding the pine.
  23. CoronaDoug Hipsters Suck

    Member Since:
    Feb 14, 2007
    Message Count:
    7,351
    Location:
    D F W
    Ratings Received:
    +753 / 10 / -2
    Yes but has he progressed enough to make him #2? :icon_shrug:
    If so then I would say cut Volek and get another young QB in here to start learning the system.
    • Super Moderator

    LT-Express Cleaning up messes on BT since 2006

    Member Since:
    Aug 4, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,158
    Location:
    CIncinnati, OH
    Ratings Received:
    +246 / 0 / -0
    Yes you are correct both of which are carrying clipboards on Sunday, however, in junk one gets playing time and one doesn't.

    Also if you look at it from the vantage point of "Career Backups" Volek has been a starter, has taken snaps in the playoffs. If you are going to give up a 3rd rounder it's not going to be for a 27 year old back up who is 3rd string and hasn't taken regular season snaps in 4 years is all im saying.

    I am willing to bet if we moved Whitehurst it would be for no more than a 5th if we were lucky.
  24. BoltzRule Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,238
    Ratings Received:
    +155 / 0 / -0
    If the Bills go after him, it'll be because Buddy Nix liked him, he's probably the one who wanted him while in SD since Whitehurst went to Clemson and Nix was the one that had ties to the South (remember all the people giving him credit for Cromartie).

    I'd be surprised if we got a 3rd for him, but I don't see AJ settling for less either.

Share This Page