1. Welcome to San Diego Chargers NFL Football Podcast and Forum!

    Bolt Talk is one of the largest online communities for the San Diego Chargers. We host a regular Chargers podcast during the season. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Create an Account or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

How to run a business, Communist Party-style

Discussion in 'Chargers Fan Forum' started by DenverBolt67, Jun 26, 2011.

  1. DenverBolt67

    DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,482
    Ratings:
    +629
    How to run a business, Communist Party-style

    By Michael Silver, Yahoo! Sports Mar 17, 12:20 pm EDT

    Some of you may not believe this, given my UC Berkeley education, lefty political orientation and recently expressed views on the NFL labor standoff, but I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of the Communist Party.

    However, I can think of 32 extremely wealthy individuals for whom such a statement might increasingly appear to be a stretch.

    In defending the NFL owners’ decision to lock out the league’s players last week, many pro-management readers asked derisively if I understood capitalism. The owners, they argued, assume all the risks – and are thus entitled to extract whatever concessions from their employees they felt were necessary to increase the profitability of their respective businesses.

    Well, I’m not sure if I understand capitalism in quite that way, but I do have a basic comprehension of communism. And I’m here to tell you that there are many similarities between the people running NFL teams and the folks in charge of Soviet-bloc governments between World War II and the fall of the Berlin Wall.

    The first and most obvious parallel is that the NFL’s 32 franchises equally distribute a large portion of their revenues, most glaringly the multi-billion-dollar TV-rights deals that are the lifeblood of the league, but also national sponsorships and licensing fees, and a percentage of gate receipts.

    There is also a de facto cost-control mechanism via the presence of a salary cap, which annually mandates minimum and maximum spending figures for player compensation. With apologies to Adam Smith, there is no “invisible hand” regulating the NFL economy; rather, it’s more like a hand making a clenched-fist salute you might have seen in Red Square in the 1950s.

    In fact, it looks like a “command and control” principle has replaced Smith’s invisible hand as the guiding principle. I haven’t seen so much central planning since Czechoslovakia was a country.

    The NFL is one big Eastern-bloc party. The league’s owners protect their economic fates by establishing perfect barriers to entry, courtesy of a partial government antitrust exemption and, until last week, a collective bargaining agreement with the players union. In other words, if my super-rich buddies and I decide we want to create a 33rd franchise and join the league, we’re told to go pound ice in Siberia. There’s no legitimate competition allowed unless it’s sanctioned by the Politburo – er, the league office.

    The owners are like the party faithful who occupy powerful Politburo posts – they ultimately make all the command and control decisions, en masse, to maximize their own aggregate benefit first, then split the spoils afterward.

    Throw in the presence of numerous facilities that have been publicly subsidized, at least on a partial basis, as well as the owners’ insistence upon financial secrecy, and you have a decent impression of Lenin’s “state capitalism”.

    Ah, but the NFL has something for the Marxist purists as well: a draft designed to improve the fortunes of the downtrodden at the expense of the fortunate. Yes, the worst shall be first at the end of April, with the Carolina Panthers now on the clock and the Super Bowl-champion Green Bay Packers picking last. Somewhere, Leon Trotsky is smiling in his grave.

    Similarly, the NFL’s scheduling formula is weighted toward giving the previous season’s also-rans a smoother path to the playoffs than the division winners – a system that regularly results in a 50-plus percent postseason turnover. And isn’t “parity” just another word for uniform equality?

    One more amusing similarity: Like the Soviet Union, the owners have their own news service (with the league’s PR operation filling the role of TASS) and a ubiquitous broadcast arm (with the NFL Network/nfl.com as the Soviet TV/Pravda counterparts).

    And yes, I know I’m going over the top with those comparisons. In reality, the folks on the NFL PR staff are pretty down-to-earth, and the NFL Network has done a commendable job of remaining reasonably balanced on the labor situation thus far – certainly better than Fox News (or, to be fair, MSNBC) on its best day.

    Still, the NFL’s latest PR spin (that the union’s decision to decertify “forced” the lockout) is a flat-out lie that would have made Leonid Brezhnev proud. As for the NFL Network, it was a bad look last Friday when, after talks broke down between the two sides, it provided live coverage of league attorney Jeff Pash making a statement and conducting a lengthy news conference but later cut away from union lawyer Jim Quinn before he fielded a single question from reporters.

    Do these things bother me? Not really – if this is the NFL’s version of a Cold War, the propaganda efforts have actually been pretty tame so far.

    What infuriates me, however, is the notion that the owners’ efforts to extract significant financial concessions from the players – to the point of shutting down their businesses – are forgiven by so many of you because, you proclaim, they assume so much risk.

    Really? What risk? I would argue that among major U.S. businesses, owning an NFL team carries the least amount of risk of any private entity.

    For one thing, franchise values continue to rise astronomically, and all economic indicators (other than the ones the owners steadfastly elect not to reveal) suggest that even in this poor economy, the business is thriving. But the real reason NFL owners don’t have to stress out like most of their counterparts in the private sector is because the TV deals are so lucrative, and their annual split so sizable, they’re basically guaranteed to make a profit.

    This has been true for several decades – no matter how lousy they may be at running their organizations, no matter how miserably their teams may perform on the field and no matter how anemic their marketing efforts may be.

    For instance, someone like ultra-cheap Cincinnati Bengals owner Mike Brown, who essentially had a stadium built for him by taxpayers and who resists creative means of generating revenue at every turn, can field a perpetually poor product and laugh all the way to the (Ohio River) bank. Similarly, Brown’s comrade William Clay Ford can afford to lure Matt Millen, a man with zero managerial experience, out of the broadcasting booth and put him in charge of the Detroit Lions for seven-plus years and, despite disastrous results, continue to haul in F150-sized truckloads of cash.

    Again, the model is deliciously Eastern-bloc. The owners love free markets, but not when it comes to labor. There is the salary cap, which ensures that more than 40 percent of adjusted revenues (and, essentially, a little more than 50 percent of total revenues) don’t go to the players; there are rules limiting free agency and movement; and, coming soon, there will be a rookie wage scale that drastically holds down the free-market value for the top incoming players. The draft, as I wrote Wednesday, violates U.S. antitrust law. Imagine Harvard’s top business-school graduate being told he must work for a firm in Buffalo, at a predetermined wage, or have no other realistic options to ply his trade.

    Certainly, I understand that football players aren’t exactly suffering under the oppressive reign of a totalitarian state. To me, they’re analogous to those Soviet and East German Olympic heroes who got to live in the nice houses, drive cool cars and go to the front of the bread lines, only with perhaps a few more perks.

    And believe it or not, I am sympathetic to the owners who’ve embraced capitalistic principles like nurturing and growing their brands, increasing their revenue streams through creative means and making bold investments like new, privately financed stadiums. I annually place these entrepreneurial leaders at the top of my owner rankings, and I regard them as a huge reason for the league’s impressive growth and unquestioned standing as our society’s preeminent sports operation.

    A brief history lesson: For too long, old-guard owners sat back passively and got fat on the shared-revenue gravy train, acting like ’70s Politburo bosses with little or no incentive to aggressively build their businesses. That changed when a new wave of owners, beginning with men like ex-San Francisco 49ers boss Eddie DeBartolo and continuing with the Dallas Cowboys’ Jerry Jones, the New England Patriots’ Robert Kraft and, yes, the Washington Redskins’ Daniel Snyder, came in and blew up the slacker model, with the selection of Paul Tagliabue as commissioner (over Jim Finks, who’d been anointed as Pete Rozelle’s successor) as one of the first acts of the revolution.

    Tagliabue and longtime NFL Players Association boss Gene Upshaw worked together to push the envelope, simultaneously creating an environment that rewarded capitalistic enterprise while increasing the wealth and rights of the workers. There was central planning – Tagliabue, in a sense, was the Alan Greenspan of the NFL – yet there were mechanisms for owners to maximize their individual brands, all of which trickled down to the workers. It was the best of both worlds, a league propped up by a communist-style safety net yet propelled by the spoils of capitalistic innovation, and all they had to do was figure out a way to split up the cash.

    Smith (right) with Colts player rep Jeff Saturday.
    (Rob Carr/Getty Images)

    That’s what the respective successors to Tagliabue and Upshaw, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith, would be best served by accomplishing in the months ahead. Until then, the ramped-up rhetoric will fly from both sides and the conflict will play out in the courtrooms, where the players will argue that the NFL is a monopoly which, in the absence of a CBA, violates antitrust law through its implementation of uniform rules.

    If the monopoly analogy doesn’t work for you, and you prefer to consider the NFL’s 32 teams to be individual businesses operating under common practices, perhaps it’s best to regard the league as a cartel. Maybe that’ll be my next column: NFL owners as OPEC chieftains.

    Realistically, I’m not sure I have a deep understanding of any of these economic principles, so I’m going to stick with my initial assertion. The NFL is the most glaring illustration of institutionalized communism in American society, and if you’re one of those knee-jerk management apologists who reveres the ground on which the owners walk, you should probably come to terms with the fact that you’ve got a fair amount of pinko coursing through your blood.

    All of which makes me wonder: When those tens of thousands of fans waited 90 minutes or more outside Cowboys Stadium last month, were they preparing to watch the Packers battle the Steelers in Super Bowl XLV – or were they merely in line for bread?

    How to run a business, Communist Party-style - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
     
  2. Blue Bolt

    Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    22,298
    Ratings:
    +4,410
    Some people may find his rhetoric over the top, but he's essentially right...... the NFL is unlike any other business in the USA. It couldn't be further from the idea of true capitalism. It's a cushy country club for billionaires.

    [​IMG]

    Looks like they're making real progress......... on the banquet table.
     
  3. Buck Melanoma

    Buck Melanoma Guest

    Ratings:
    +408
    While the NFL may be fairly unique as a business operating in the US, I hardly think that Silver is prepared to discuss Communism with much if any expertise. Kinda like his discussion of football. :rolleyes:
     
  4. paddyirishman

    paddyirishman BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    776
    Ratings:
    +60
    ooohhh, Lobsters
     
  5. SDRaiderH8er

    SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    11,637
    Ratings:
    +2,074
    this is America, if he does not like what he sees. then he is free to find another sport.
     
  6. DenverBolt67

    DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,482
    Ratings:
    +629
    You fail to grasp the point. The point he was making was that for all the people who say this is a capitalist economy, so the owners should be able to do what ever they want, are completely misinformed because nothing about the way the NFL operates is capitalist
     
  7. SDRaiderH8er

    SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    11,637
    Ratings:
    +2,074
    I do grasp it. But there are other ways to spend a Sunday. If someone does not like how the NFL operates, then they can go elsewhere. If they want to be a fan of the NFL, then this is the way it will be. I am still waiting to see if there is a 2011 season. I paid my money in full. I was told for every game that is cancelled I will get my money back. I have to accept it, or leave it. But to come out and say the NFL is Communist, well that’s just one persons opinion, and it’s an opinion that some of us don’t feel the same way. I accept it, he is allowed to express it.
     
  8. DenverBolt67

    DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,482
    Ratings:
    +629
    I, nor the writer are saying it should change, just that the "It is capitalist" argument is complete bull ****. Not saying anyone has to choose one side r the other, just that there is nothing capitalist about the way the NFL operates, so to use that as the argument to support what is going on, is also bull ****.
     
  9. HEXEDBOLT

    HEXEDBOLT Don't like it, lump it!!!

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    14,284
    Ratings:
    +1,886
    I'd run my business the way I see fit. Whether or not you agree is of no consequence to me, I put up the money and time to build and no one is forcing you to like it or use it. End of story.
     
  10. Blue Bolt

    Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    22,298
    Ratings:
    +4,410
    Oh, which NFL franchise do you own? ;)
     
  11. HEXEDBOLT

    HEXEDBOLT Don't like it, lump it!!!

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    14,284
    Ratings:
    +1,886
    Did I claim to own a NFL franchise???
     
  12. SDRaiderH8er

    SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    11,637
    Ratings:
    +2,074
    It’s their money, it’s their league, and it’s their rules. We as fans do not have a say in anything.
     
  13. DenverBolt67

    DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,482
    Ratings:
    +629
    If you had a business, you wouldn't have an anti-trust exemption that allowed you to operate your business in a non-competitive environment
     
  14. DenverBolt67

    DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,482
    Ratings:
    +629
    We do when us tax payers have granted them a anti-trust exemption allowing them to operate a monopoly legally.
     
  15. SDRaiderH8er

    SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    11,637
    Ratings:
    +2,074
    I am not a Lawyer, never was and never will be. Now if you want to keep your F/A-18 Aircraft and or CH-53 Aircraft in the air flying, then I can help you out. If you want to do some Process Improvement, then again I might be able to help you out there also. As far as operating Monopolies, I am clueless in San Diego. I just want the season to start. I am sick and freaking tired of all this wasted B.S.

    I don’t want to attack my fellow Charger fans, buts that what we have dropped down to lately. I love my team, and all I want is to watch them play in September, then all the way through February. Then Rivers can hoist the Lombardi, and we start reciting stats like they mean something again.
     
  16. Buck Melanoma

    Buck Melanoma Guest

    Ratings:
    +408
    Hey it's only half way to a fun conversation. We've had the "take it or leave it" post. Now all we need is to mention Hitler. :-p
     
  17. SDRaiderH8er

    SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    11,637
    Ratings:
    +2,074
    yea but ya know what, all of this is getting old. Are you and the wife coming out for the KC game this year?
     
  18. Blue Bolt

    Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    22,298
    Ratings:
    +4,410
    I guess, I missed how your comment was relevant to the discussion of the way the NFL operates.
     
  19. Concudan

    Concudan Caffeinated Commando

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    53,044
    Ratings:
    +4,979
    Didnt you just provide that?!
     
  20. Concudan

    Concudan Caffeinated Commando

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    53,044
    Ratings:
    +4,979
    H8er. I am not attacking you. But until we have a lombardi I refuse to pout and say that having a good team, achieving goals other than hoisting the lombardi are worthless. Maybe that mentality works for you and others. Thats fine, I already have said repeatedly we can agree to disagree.

    But I will take all the enjoyment I can from the team UNTIL AND AFTER we hoist the lombardi. In that way I think any other option is crazy, I enjoy the trek there and the hoist, you and others appear to me via your posting habits to not be enjoying following the team UNTIL such time as they win it all. Then if youre like some, they wont accept one this year because of an astrix. So it seems like some want to just gripe. OK gripe. But I dont have to agree... Am I incorrect?
     
  21. Concudan

    Concudan Caffeinated Commando

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    53,044
    Ratings:
    +4,979
    I saw a common concept...
     
  22. Blue Bolt

    Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    22,298
    Ratings:
    +4,410
    Could you explain?......... does HEXEDBOLT hit up the taxpayers for a new building? Did he get an anti-trust exemption from Congress so he wouldn't have to deal with real competition? I frankly don't see much in common with how most business people operate.
     
  23. Concudan

    Concudan Caffeinated Commando

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    53,044
    Ratings:
    +4,979
    You are siloing the conversation pretty tightly theer bloomer... He is running a businees and simply said he would run it as he saw best. Much as the owners of the NFL have reportedly said. What you touch on is much of the picture, but there are other facets....

    Because KMart does not get to push the suppliers around like Walmart does, does not mean that when discussing the business of retail you eliminate one.... So there Pttttttttttttt!
     
  24. Blue Bolt

    Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    22,298
    Ratings:
    +4,410
    If Walmart and Kmart were in the NFL, they would be sharing revenue and marketing costs.

    My point was simple....... the NFL doesn't operate like other businesses in the USA. They are much closer to a cartel than competing businesses. The only real competition is on the playing field, not on the business side of the operation.
     
  25. Concudan

    Concudan Caffeinated Commando

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    53,044
    Ratings:
    +4,979
    Correct, but that does not eliminate the possibility of high level comparisons.
     
  26. Blue Bolt

    Blue Bolt Persona Non Grata

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2009
    Messages:
    22,298
    Ratings:
    +4,410
    It just makes comparisons to other USA businesses of little value..... #imjustsaying ;)
     
  27. Enormo

    Enormo BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,216
    Ratings:
    +210
    LOL!!! It's called an "oligarchy", you rube!

    But, hell, if you're willing to sacrifice whatever little credibility you already had for the sake of trying to exploit the political hot-button issues of the day, then more power to you, you junior high school poli-sci class failing dunce.
     
  28. powayslugger

    powayslugger Feckless Slappy

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    1,297
    Ratings:
    +276
    WTF is Jerry Jones doing... blowing a duck call???
     
  29. Buck Melanoma

    Buck Melanoma Guest

    Ratings:
    +408
    Nope. Not a dime on the NFL this year.
     
  30. starry

    starry BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    97
    Ratings:
    +13
    The government controls how people are allowed to run their business though. The government changes the rules then you have to run it differently whether you like it or not. And if the people how you need to run your business (whether customers or employees) don't like how it is run then you have problems. Businesses don't exist in a vacuum, they live or die according to how they interact with others.
     

Share This Page