1. Welcome to Los Angeles Chargers NFL Football Podcast and Forum!

    Bolt Talk is one of the largest online communities for the Los Angeles Chargers. We host a regular Chargers podcast during the season. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Sign Up or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Nevada judge denies motions in Roethlisberger case

Discussion in 'American Football' started by Johnny Lightning, Sep 30, 2009.

  1. Johnny Lightning

    Johnny Lightning Go Bolts

    Feb 7, 2006

    Nevada judge denies motions in Roethlisberger case

    By SANDRA CHEREB, Associated Press Writer

    CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP)—A Nevada judge denied motions by lawyers for Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger(notes) to dismiss a civil lawsuit alleging he raped a Lake Tahoe casino worker, according to court documents released Wednesday.

    Washoe District Judge Brent Adams rejected arguments that the suit should be dismissed, saying the woman’s allegations make a “sufficient” claim that if proven, would entitle her to relief.

    “The court recognizes that a motion to dismiss is only proper where it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff could prove no set of facts which, if true, would entitle them to relief,” Adams wrote in the order filed late Tuesday.

    Adams also refused to strike the woman’s complaint, finding that as written, it is not “unnecessarily salacious or graphic,” as argued by Roethlisberger’s lawyers.

    In other brief orders, the judge also rejected arguments that the suit should be dismissed because it failed to name an “indispensable party”—that being Harrah’s Hotel-Casino—and denied Roethlisberger’s request to expedite discovery, or the sharing of evidence.

    Roethlisberger’s lawyer David Cornwell said that despite the outcome, his team was encouraged by the judge’s reasoning.

    “Finding that plaintiff survived this round because of a generous ‘beyond doubt’ standard indicates that, at these early stages, the court is inclined to give plaintiff her day in court,” Cornwell said in a written statement. “Of course, this cuts both ways.

    “In any event, her allegations remain false and we remain committed to a vigorous defense.”
    Cal Dunlap, the woman’s lawyer, has repeatedly declined comment on court filings and did so on Wednesday. The Associated Press, as a matter of policy, does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted.

    The woman, a 31-year-old VIP hostess at Harrah’s, filed a civil suit in July, alleging Roethlisberger sexually assaulted her while he was at Lake Tahoe the previous summer to compete in a celebrity golf tournament. The suit claimed she was hospitalized for several months because she was traumatized after the alleged attack.

    The woman’s suit seeks a minimum $440,000 in damages from Roethlisberger, unspecified punitive damages and at least $50,000 in damages from eight Harrah’s officials she accuses of orchestrating a cover-up of the incident.

    In a separate order, the judge dismissed a claim of trespass against former Harrah’s employee Stacy Dingman, identified in the woman’s suit as once being her best friend.

    Adams said a more definitive statement is needed for the woman to pursue conspiracy allegations against Dingman, but he left intact other claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, defamation and punitive damages.


Share This Page