1. Welcome to San Diego Chargers NFL Football Podcast and Forum!

    Bolt Talk is one of the largest online communities for the San Diego Chargers. We host a regular Chargers podcast during the season. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Create an Account or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

NFL CBA; Owners vs Players

Discussion in 'Chargers Fan Forum' started by Concudan, Feb 4, 2011.

  1. Concudan

    Concudan Caffeinated Commando

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    53,030
    Ratings:
    +4,976
    Curtis M. Egan
    2/4/11

    The head of the National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) DeMaurice Smith, has been quoted as saying the NFL and the NFLPA are at war. I believe this to be an accurate statement, a slightly civil war, in which apparently, based on recent rulings has the NFL playing the part of the industrialized north, and the NFLPA playing the part of the willing but ill-equipped south.

    The Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) is set to expire on March 4th of this year. With it years of labor peace go out the window. The NFLPA publicly has been combative in the past, but recently has toned down the attacking verbiage. This may be in the wake of back to back ruling against the NFLPA, and the fact that the players themselves have publicly stated they want to continue to play.

    The first ruling was concerning the television contracts that would pay the NFL even if there were no games played in 2011. The NFLPA fought this, accusing the NFL of structuring television contracts to provide lockout insurance. The union argued this violated an agreement between the sides that says the NFL must make good-faith efforts to maximize revenue for players.

    While the NFLPA was awarded damages of approximately $7 million, the union was unsuccessful in locking up $4 billion in television revenues for the players against games lost in 2011. While that motion did fail, the NFLPA is assured to appeal the ruling.

    Another loss was recent ruling stating that the NFL will not have to pay the players health insurance costs in the event that the CBA expires in one month.

    These ruling and comments by players such as Antonio Cromartie, who stated that the players are not aware of what the issues are and called for an immediate deal to be brokered has made the union look weak, and fractured.

    The NFL ownership has clearly ‘industrialized’, by preparing for a lockout and finding ways to maintain cash flow in the event of one. While the NFLPA is serious to, they do not appear to have the positioning, or cohesiveness to make a prolonged successful stand. In the event of the CBA expiring, the NFLPA will most likely be decertified, leaving the fight to individual players. North vs. the South.

    So what are all these rich folk squabbling over anyways? I mean face it; the NFL earns approximately $8.5 billion dollars a year off of advertising, ticket sales and television revenues alone. That is not enough to cut up to make all sides happy? Really, do these fat cats realize we are in the midst of an economic depression? Each side wants a bigger cut of the pie… so they fight.

    However there are other issues that highlight the biggest problem, which is a lack of trust and open communication between the sides.

    Owners:
    1) Cost of business cutting profits to single digit figures.

    2) The NFL under the current CBA can fine players for off the field behavior.

    3) There has been federal review of labor deals since 1993. The owners feel that is no longer required.

    4) There are monies that are not accounted to the collective Total Revenue ‘pool’. Owners keep the first 1 billion dollars that go into the pool for league operating costs. The owners want the number increased to 18% or 3.63 billion.

    5) The owners want league wide HGH testing for all players. Currently there are no tests for Human Growth Hormones.

    6) The owners want a rookie wage scale to protect them from spending millions of dollars on players who never develop in the NFL. The NFL owners have suggested moving to a system much like the NBA uses that has a slotted value, so each pick would know how much money they would receive.

    7) Wants to eliminate 2 preseason games, and increase the regular season to 18 games. The owners have maid claims that this could solve some of the base economic issues facing the league.

    8) Owners want player conduct tied to signing bonuses. The signing bonuses are guaranteed. When the league tries to recoup bonuses form players like Plaxico Burress and Mike Vick, the U.S. courts ruled in favor of the players' union. The owners want signing bonuses to be returned if players commit crimes, violate the contract, or quit the team.


    Players:
    1) The players do not trust the owners figures, and want the financials audited.

    2) The players feel the commissioner has too much power under the current CBA, and question why the league can fine them for issues that do not impact the league directly.

    3) The players want to maintain federal review, as a means of settling disputes.

    4) The players want to keep the current revenue sharing model.

    5) The players are concerned that there are no reliable tests for HGH and false positives will affect a player’s career and image.

    6) The Union has changes stance recently from “not only no, but HELL NO!” to being amenable to the idea. However, in return they want a maximum duration limit on rookie salaries to be 3 years.

    7) The players are concerned with more injuries, in an era where concussions have driven new rules, and hits are fined more readily, they are concerned that the extended season will have a negative impact on the players as a whole.

    8) The NFL is the only major American professional sports league that does not fully guarantee the players contracts. The players are concerned that if the league gets the wording for returning bonuses (or the guaranteed portion of a contract) those teams could cut a player and not have to pay any of the guaranteed money.


    There are other issues, such a disability and healthcare for retired players etc. However the biggest issues seem to be a lack of trust and open communication between the two sides.

    Perhaps the NFL and the NFLPA should start figuring out how to explain to the public, who are suffering through a economic depression why we should give a flying squirrel whether or not one side or the other gets a bigger cut of this billion dollar industry.

    Their feuding and fighting will not drive down the cost of the seeing the games. Their negotiations will not lift the archaic blackout rule, so nothing changes for us. To be frank, the NFL and the NFLPA do not care about the ‘us’ so long as there are enough businesses and affluent people paying for luxury boxes, personal seat licenses and Super Bowl tickets. The league is no longer for the average man. This feud between Billionaires and millionaires makes that even clearer.


    Common Questions:
    Will there be a draft?
    Yes:
    This indicates there will be a draft regardless of if there is a season, or a CBA.

    How long will teams retain rights to drafted players:
    1 to 3 years

    That indicates one year, where does the 3 years come from?
    The CBA has language extending the period if the player signs or is employed by another professional football team, not in the NFL…

    It should be pointed out that this is the case providing there is a union. If the union were to decertify, it can no longer represent the players, and the lawyers get involved and who knows what would happen then.

    At this point I would say there is a 70% chance that a lockout would happen. This is slightly better odd than DeMaurice gave before the last Super Bowl when he said on a scale of 1 to 10, the chances of a lockout were... 14... But it is still a bleak picture of the haves wanting more.
     
  2. DenverBolt67

    DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,482
    Ratings:
    +629
    I think the question of "Where does the 3 years come from", is that the team still retains the rights to a player for 4 years (6 in the case of the 2010 season) by way of restricted free agency. The union is looking for all draft picks to be unrestricted free agents after 3 years so if they had out performed their rookie contract, they have the ability to make market value after only 3 years instead of 4
     
  3. Concudan

    Concudan Caffeinated Commando

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    53,030
    Ratings:
    +4,976
    Understand, the quote was from the current CBA, setting the clause for after that CBA expires. So that is terminology for contractual rights in a period with no CBA coverage.

    The Union will probably not get all rookie contracts to the 3 year limit they want, though I think that would be a good compromise. Most teams should know by the 3rd year if they want to keep the player.
     
  4. DenverBolt67

    DenverBolt67 BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,482
    Ratings:
    +629
    I agree especially since rookie contracts will probably be really cheap and the average NFL career is only around 3 years anyways
     
  5. The LBC

    The LBC I'm a Real Prick

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    Messages:
    3,979
    Ratings:
    +1,394
    Good article, Conc (though your avatar is still kind of creeping me out, and I don't know why...).

    Somehow, I just don't get the feeling that DeMaurice Smith grasps the concept of "bargaining" other than the belief that if he continues to hold a non-budging hard line that eventually ownership will compromise and concede themselves into some sort of situation that is favorable for the Union. He seems to be counting on the public vilifying the billionaire owners in the event the axe does finally fall and there is no football this year. The thing is, if ownership can show a greater track record both pre- and post-lockout that they've at least been trying to work out ways in which the items their seeking can be achieved with some concession to the demands made by the other side, versus just saying you are willing to sit down at the table (as Smith's stance with the union has been), the long and short of it is that the longer it goes the more the players are likely to be the ones vilified. And that is for no other reason than the media is and will continue to cover the league because... they're paying them anyway they might as well use that access.

    I can't help but feel like everything I've heard from the union has been in the vein of "give us what we want or else" but then turning around and pointing the finger and saying "there will be a lockout because they (evil ownership) are going to be locking our poor helpless players out in the cold when the CBA expires in March."
     
  6. Concudan

    Concudan Caffeinated Commando

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    53,030
    Ratings:
    +4,976
    The avatar is Pipboy from the fallout game series...

    I feel the union is just presenting itself as far too disorganized. I also feel (no facts or knowledge to back it up, just a gut feeling) that most of the owners are willing to deal, but the big few, Jones, Snyder, Kraft etc... want to stick it to the union and 'take back their league'.

    Bottom line, we the fans gain nothing but possibly a crapy 2011 season.
     
  7. SDRaiderH8er

    SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    11,630
    Ratings:
    +2,072
    all the players know that you dont sign a 4 year deal, you sign 4 one year deals. Guaranteed money will stop that.

    I just signed a 75 Million dollar contract and I got some incentives plus I got a 20 million signing bonus, yea baby there will be a huge party tonight!!!!!!!
     

Share This Page