1. Welcome to San Diego Chargers NFL Football Podcast and Forum!

    Bolt Talk is one of the largest online communities for the San Diego Chargers. We host a regular Chargers podcast during the season. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Create an Account or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

Southwest Airlines = Fashion Police?

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by Thumper, Sep 5, 2007.

  1. Thumper

    Thumper WHS

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,615
    Ratings:
    +1,467
    Southwest fashion police set no-fly zone

    September 5, 2007

    As the mercury climbed over 100 on Labor Day, I called Southwest Airlines with a not entirely hypothetical question:

    Could a young woman board a flight to Tucson today wearing a bikini top?

    Angelique, the agent who took my call, assured me that a young woman could.

    “We don't have a problem with it if she's covered up in all the right spots,” she said. “We don't have a dress code.”

    Tell that to Kyla Ebbert, who was escorted off a Southwest Airlines flight two months ago for wearing an outfit far less revealing than a bikini top.

    Ebbert, a Mesa College student and Hooters waitress, was allowed to stay on the plane, but only after she put up a fight and, she says, was lectured on how to dress properly.

    I don't know about you, but one of my big gripes with the airlines is that they just don't take the time to dispense fashion advice any more.

    Southwest explained its treatment of Ebbert in a letter to her mother, saying it could remove any passenger “whose clothing is lewd, obscene or patently offensive” to ensure the comfort of children and “adults with heightened sensitivities.”

    Ebbert, 23, says she was judged unfairly by the airline and humiliated by the experience. Who wouldn't be?

    She had a doctor's appointment that afternoon in Tucson, where temperatures had topped 106 all week. She arrived at Lindbergh Field wearing a white denim miniskirt, high-heel sandals, and a turquoise summer sweater over a tank top over a bra.

    After the plane filled, and the flight attendants began their safety spiel, Ebbert was asked to step off the plane by a customer service supervisor, identified by the airline only as “Keith.”

    They walked out onto the jet bridge, where Keith told Ebbert her clothing was inappropriate and asked her to change. She explained she was flying to Tucson for only a few hours and had brought no luggage.

    “I asked him what part of my outfit was offensive,” she said. “The shirt? The skirt? And he said, 'The whole thing.' ”

    Keith asked her to go home, change and take a later flight. She refused, citing her appointment. The plane was ready to leave, so Keith relented. He had her pull up her tank top a bit, pull down her skirt a bit, and return to her seat.

    Ebbert says several flight attendants overheard the conversation and, after an embarrassing walk down the aisle, she took her seat and spread a blanket over her lap. She kept her composure until the plane landed, when she called her mother and broke down.

    She took a photo of herself with her cell phone so her mother could see her clothes. That's when mom became livid.

    “My daughter is young, tall, blond and beautiful,” Michele Ebbert told me, “and she is both envied and complimented on her appearance. She dresses provocatively, as do 99 percent of 23-year-old girls who can. But they were out of line.”

    Who knows where the lines are drawn these days, particularly when it comes to dress? If you watch television, or visit the mall, or take in a game at Petco Park, you'll see women dressed in ways that, 50 years ago, were pornographic. Today they are stylish.

    A Supreme Court justice famously could not define “obscene,” and declaring a thing “lewd” imputes motive. Did Kyla Ebbert intend to excite sexual desire on that flight to Tucson? I doubt it, just as I doubt that flight attendants are proper judges of such matters.

    But neither am I. So when I arranged to see Ebbert in the notorious outfit, I brought along my fashion advisers, writer Nina Garin and photojournalist Crissy Pascual, who for years collaborated on a feature in this newspaper called “Seen on the Street.”

    The three of us met Ebbert and her mother for lunch at Nordstrom Cafe. Ebbert, who is 5-foot-5 and has green eyes, is pretty enough to be a model.

    Yet even wearing the clothes that scandalized Southwest, she did not attract attention beyond some lingering glances.

    My fashion advisers were baffled, saying they saw nothing you don't see on a college campus or in Pacific Beach.

    “I was expecting to be shocked, and I was shocked the other way,” Pascual told me.

    “It wasn't a big deal,” Garin said. “Her skirt was a bit short, which was only accented by her heels. If she had been wearing flip-flops it wouldn't have mattered.”

    Garin wondered if a jealous woman may have complained about Ebbert's outfit. I asked her what she would have said had she been on the plane.

    “ 'I hope she's not sitting next to my husband,' ” Garin replied. “She's pretty. She wears her clothes well. But I wouldn't complain about it.”

    Pascual detected sexism in the way Ebbert was treated, wondering if a man would have been asked to change clothes. Do men dress inappropriately? “I see butt cracks, a lot of butt cracks,” she said.

    In its letter, Southwest said “there were concerns about the revealing nature of her outfit.”

    I called Hollye Chacón, the Southwest customer relations representative who wrote the letter, to see if we were talking about the same outfit.

    “What exactly was being revealed?” I asked.

    She said yesterday she'd call back, but never did. That's pretty revealing in itself.
     
  2. Boltdiehard

    Boltdiehard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,817
    Ratings:
    +1,171
    Southwest should hire me to be the judge. :yes:

    problem solved.
     
  3. sdbound

    sdbound Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,417
    Ratings:
    +942
    BFD. I'm not impressed. Yes, this is the outfit in question.
    [​IMG]
     
  4. Thumper

    Thumper WHS

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,615
    Ratings:
    +1,467
    She should sue.
     
  5. Electric Chair

    Electric Chair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    8,559
    Ratings:
    +579
    I'd hit it.
     
  6. PowderLove

    PowderLove Former Mod, Current Slacker

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,910
    Ratings:
    +494
    DOWN WITH SOUTHWEST!!!!!

    Man, I gotta find out which airlines don't mind what chix wear. I think the girlies should be able to wear what they wants. :icon_twisted:
     
  7. PowderLove

    PowderLove Former Mod, Current Slacker

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,910
    Ratings:
    +494
    After she's stopped crying, or during?
     
  8. sdbound

    sdbound Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,417
    Ratings:
    +942
    [​IMG]
     
  9. sdbound

    sdbound Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,417
    Ratings:
    +942
  10. Electric Chair

    Electric Chair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    8,559
    Ratings:
    +579
    :icon_rofl:

    Those tears aren't real. Each drop represents $10,000 cash. :yes:
     
  11. Kwak

    Kwak ....

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,294
    Ratings:
    +684
    That is funny. Prolly some old bag wife was pissed that her husband was ogling her and complained. :yes:

    SW is going to pay a few $$$ for that one.
     
  12. SDRaiderH8er

    SDRaiderH8er Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Messages:
    11,636
    Ratings:
    +2,072
    Anyone know a godd lawyer
     
  13. PowderLove

    PowderLove Former Mod, Current Slacker

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,910
    Ratings:
    +494
    God's lawyer might be too expensive for her:icon_tease:
     
  14. Electric Chair

    Electric Chair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    8,559
    Ratings:
    +579
    Just watched her on the Today Show. Cute girl. They are "currently exploring all possibilities and haven't made a decision whether or not they are going to sue", according to her lawyer. :lol:

    She said, "I just want Southwest to admit that they were wrong".

    Yeah, she is going for blood.
     

Share This Page