1. Welcome to San Diego Chargers NFL Football Podcast and Forum!

    Bolt Talk is one of the largest online communities for the San Diego Chargers. We host a regular Chargers podcast during the season. You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user.

    Create an Account or

    Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions. Furthermore, we hide most of the ads once you register as a member!
    Dismiss Notice

The official y'all ain't gonna believe this **** thread

Discussion in 'The Lounge' started by BFISA, Jul 10, 2008.

  1. BFISA

    BFISA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    41,645
    Ratings:
    +2,172
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Game123

    Game123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    880
    Ratings:
    +97
    And, why would a terrorist not rip off the dinky bracelet before committing his crime?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Buck Melanoma

    Buck Melanoma Guest

    Ratings:
    +408
    Good question. :icon_shrug:
     
  4. BFISA

    BFISA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    41,645
    Ratings:
    +2,172
    Shocking, but False

    Sometimes it just amazes me how these stories evolve. Let me start off by saying that the Department of Homeland Security’s Science & Technology Directorate nor TSA have been pursuing shock bracelets for airline passengers as alleged by the Washington Times Blog.

    This allegation stemmed from a misleading video posted on the Lamberd Website which depicts an ID bracelet that would contain identifying information as well as the ability to stun the wearer. The company claims to connect use of such a device to DHS and TSA, but no discussions between these agencies has ever taken place.

    This all originated from a meeting held two years ago with a private company representative (not Lamberd) who proposed bracelet technology in response to the TSA's desire to find less-than-lethal means to detain an apprehended suspect. The bracelet was never intended to replace boarding passes, contain ID information or be worn by all passengers as asserted in the Lamberd video and discussed in the Washington Times Blog.

    The hypothetical use of the bracelet would have been for transporting already apprehended prisoners and detainees at prisons and border patrol facilities, and DHS was looking to see if there were potential air travel applications for apprehended suspects.

    This concept was never funded or supported by the DHS or TSA and hasn’t even been discussed for two years. The letter circulating throughout the blogosphere from Paul Ruwaldt was not addressed to Lamberd and merely states the DHS was interested in learning more about the technology.

    Neither side followed up. DHS/TSA does NOT support the asserted use and has not pursued the development of such technology. - John VerricoDHS S&T Spokesman
     
  5. SnappySammy

    SnappySammy BoltTalker

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    97
    Ratings:
    +104

    Wrong wrong wrong
     
  6. Lightning's Girl

    Lightning's Girl Mod Chick =) Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    3,835
    Ratings:
    +1,153
    I sure hope you're right about that, Toby.

    However, I wouldn't put it past this administration, DHS, or TSA to try something like it. :icon_evil:
     
  7. BFISA

    BFISA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2005
    Messages:
    41,645
    Ratings:
    +2,172
    Wouldn't surprise me either, Darlin.
     

Share This Page